Meta-ethnography synthesising qualitative studies

Contact Background of Meta-ethnography Meta-ethnography is an interpretive qualitative synthesis approach. It was developed by Noblit and Hare, in the field of education, in the s. They designed the approach to address the inability of an aggregative synthesis of five ethnographic studies to explain the failure of racial desegregation in schools.

Meta-ethnography synthesising qualitative studies

Meta-ethnography synthesising qualitative studies

Noblit and Hare propose a new method for synthesizing from qualitative studies: After citing the criteria to be used in comparing qualitative research projects, the authors define the ways these can then be aggregated to create more cogent syntheses of research. Using examples from numerous studies ranging from ethnographic work in educational settings to the Mead-Freeman controversy over Samoan youth, Meta-Ethnography offers useful procedural advice from both comparative and cumulative analyses of qualitative data.

This provocative volume will be read with interest by researchers and students in qualitative research methods, ethnography, education, sociology, and anthropology.

Contain s valuable strategies at a seldom-used level of analysis. Meta-Ethnography is well worth consulting for the problem definition it offers. Someone needed to break the ice and offer a strategy for summarizing multiple ethnographic studies.

Noblit and Hare have done a commendable job of giving the research community one approach for doing so. Further, no one else can now venture into this area of synthesizing qualitative studies without making references to and positioning themselves vis-a-vis this volume.Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.

Sorry! Something went wrong!

Synthesising findings from individual qualitative studies may be one method but application of conventional systematic review methodology to qualitative research presents significant philosophical and practical challenges. The. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies.

INTRODUCTION. Mixed methods research integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, whereas mixed studies reviews integrate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Mixed methods have been used for several decades in public health. For example, the Village Studies conducted in the s used mixed methods, in which ethnographic studies were combined with economic studies ().

Noblit and Hare propose a method -- meta-ethnography -- for synthesizing from qualitative, interpretive studies.

6 Reviewing research evidence

They show that ethnographies themselves are interpretive acts, and demonstrate that by translating metaphors and key concepts between ethnographic studies, it is possible to develop a broader interpretive synthesis. Box Methods proposed for the synthesis of qualitative evidence: Synthesis method.

Meta-ethnography synthesising qualitative studies

Description. Meta-ethnography A set of techniques for synthesising qualitative studies. It involves the selection, comparison and analysis . Abstract and Introduction. Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major contributor to the global burden of disease and has received considerable attention in recent years, particularly in low- and.

ยป Background of Meta-ethnography